?
2008-11-06 07:59:03 UTC
When Elizabeth returns to her inn, she finds two letters from Jane: the first relates that Lydia has eloped with Wickham, the second that there is no word from the couple and that they may not be married yet
Darcy was quite the gentleman and offered 'consolation to such distress' and as a result Elizabeth ' threw a retrospective glance over the whole of their acquaintance, so full of contradictions and varieties, sighed at the perverseness of those feelings which would now have promoted its continuance, and would formerly have rejoiced in its termination.'
Throughout the story, Elizabeth has been my much-loved heroine. A sharp tongued, witty, delightful, classy and somewhat of a feminist character.
So i was slightly peeved off that she throws a 'retrospective glance' at her relations with Darcy and i imagine comes to the conclusion that she could very well love him at her most vulnerable state.
She is renowned for being so strong minded and a little proud herself, yet when her families shame batters her pride a great deal and she becomes emotionally unstable, she comes to the conclusion that she is in love.
Is Jane Austen not better than this? Subjecting an amazing woman, in a highly vulnerable state, to the realization that she could be in love.
Typical.
Just imagine,Darcy was not there to to lean on when she was upset. Do you think she would then believe she loved him?
Don't get me wrong, i love Darcy, i think he is a fabulous gent. I just think it was a tiny bit dissapointing.