Twilight or Harry Potter?

Question

there is alot twilight and harry potter fans out there, im just curiouse which book has more fans, tell me witch one you like more and why :) not that this will prove anything

Answer 1

Just for the record Twilight has sold 42 million copies

Harry Potter has sold over 400 million



I think Harry Potter is a little more popular



Ok Twilight is, I can honestly say the worst book I have ever read

Bella: I love you Edward

Edward: I love you too you are so beautiful

Bella: No YOU are so beautiful. I love you. You're all sparkly

Edward: You are the most perfect creature ever

1000 pages and 3 books later

Bella: I love you Edward

Edward: I love you you are so beautiful

OMFG it's just them proliferating their love for each other for 1000+ pages. And right at the end Smeyer is like JESUS CHRIST I NEED PLOT and throws some crap in.



Ok Edward is not hot. He is a creepy stalker. he watches her sleep. He won't let her see her friends. He follows her around. He won't let her drive. He beats her up while they're having sex. He gives her a c-section with his teeth. Come on that's gross. Bella is disgusting, falling apart as soon as Edward leaves and only getting some semblance of togetherness back when she finds another guy to take Edward's place. PATHETIC.



Harry Potter beats Twilight hands down. Harry Potter caters for a much wider audience, while Twilight appeals to tween's. Every single one of my friends hates Twilight. Thinks it's absolutely ridiculous, the writing is terrible, the characters one dimensional and the plot cliche. We're 18. My sister, who is 13 is in love with Twilight. So are all her friends. They get together and talk about it and how 'awesome' it is and 'how much they love Edward' and how they 'just wish Jacob would die'.



Younger kids love the earlier Harry Potter books. But can you really see a 10 year old finishing Order of the Phoenix. They'd have to be a pretty smart 10 year old. But Harry Potter has fans in every walk of life. The Harry Potter phenomenon started, really, about 7 years ago. The people that started reading Harry Potter at say, age 10-14, are now 17-21. They're adults and the majority of them still love Harry Potter. And there's the giant adult fan base. Basically every single harry potter fan site it run by an older adult. And there's hundreds of them. I made my parents read Harry Potter. They liked it. Read the whole series. My sister made them read Twilight. Mum said the first book was terribly written and couldn't continue. Dad couldn't even finish the first book. They both have uni degrees, they're not idiots.



Basically Twilight is aimed for girls 12-16. Smeyer writes likes she's swallowed a thesaurus, her books are riddled with plot holes and discrepancies. How can Edward, who has been dead for nearly 100 years, have sperm, which is alive, and has the capability to father a child. Yeah makes awesome sense. Plus he's a complete stalker. And abusive. Bella is portrayed as a woman who relies entirely on a man, after Edward left she completely fell apart. And this girl is supposed to be a rolemodel for other girls.



Now compare this to Harry Potter. Please show me one plot hole. The main characters have substance and flaws and are amazing role models. Look at Hermione in comparison to Bella. She's smart, loyal, courageous and stands up for what she believes in. She loves Ron from the age of 14, and despite his not realizing it, she still stays strong and continues on in her life. The perfect role model for young girls. Harry is also a great role model. He continues to love despite the terrible events which have occured in his life. He is even willing to sacrifice his own life for everybody else. There's hundreds of other amazing characters. Ron, Snape, Dumbledore, Remus Lupin, Ginny. The list goes on and on. Who have you got in Twilight? more and more one dimensional characters who are nothing more than pretty stalkers.



Ok and every single character in Twilight is one dimensional.

Bella: Pathetic Mary Sue

Edward: I love you Bella. And the oldest virgin ever

Jacob: annoying.

And that's it. That's all the major characters. If you include like Emmett and Jasper and Alice. They don't even have personalities. The best one, in my opinion is Rosalie.



Every single Harry Potter character has a background, unique personality and REAL faults. Choose me ANY character and you can pull faults and positive traits in their personalities. Not like Bella being "clumsy" which everyone seems to find endearing so isn't really a fault at all. And what's with her supposed to be average looking? yeah ok coz it's not like every guy in the school wants to be in her pants apparently. At my high school all the guys went for the average girl, definitely. Sorry now I'm onto the Bella being a Mary Sue rant again.



And JK obviously put some effort and research into Harry Potter. I mean look at the deep roots into mythology, legends, latin and other languages. Stephenie meyer had a pretty dream. Good for her. Even other authors acknowledge how much better Rowling is to Smeyer. Stephen King, best selling author for decades said:

"The real difference is that Jo Rowling is a terrific writer and Stephenie Meyer can't write worth a darn," he said. "She's not very good."



JK Rowling intertwines foreshadowing through the entire series, with events in the first novel foreshadowing events that occur in the seventh, which was written 17 years later. What have you got in Twilight? certainly nothing that would match Harry Potter. You simply have a love story which appeals to kids who haven't got the maturity to realize how fake it is, or the life experience to realize it is appallingly written

Answer 2

I've read both, but Harry Potter wins hands down for several reasons.



The first is the message: that overall, love is this most important thing. Especially love for family. Twilight seems to promote the notion that romantic love overrules all, family, etc.



Secondly, it's better written. Hate to insult Twilight fans, but it's true.



Thirdly, it's much more realistic. I'm not talking about the scenario, since they're both obviously fantasy, but in real life, people die. They get hurt, bad things happen, and in the end everything is not always okay.



People are not inherently good or evil, and Harry Potter delved into this deeply with the characters of Dumbledore and Snape. Twilight overlooks this. You are good or you are bad.



I think Twilight is an okay read, but not something to reccomend to children to take a message from. Twilight also seems to promote that the worst possible thing is death - immortality at all costs, which is what Voldemort, the villain in Harry Potter, sought so desperately.



I could go on forever, but it's late. Take care.

Answer 3

Books: Harry Potter Narnia Twilight it is not basic to compliment between Harry Potter and Narnia yet primary i think of Harry Potter had greater suited characters. Twilight is merely awful, in hassle-free terms women 10-20 like it, you somewhat can't learn it to Narnia or Harry Potter. movies: Harry Potter Narnia Twilight. Heh, comparable because of the fact the books. Harry Potter 3 replaced into the only undesirable Harry Potter movie and there is been 5 while with Narnia they screwed up on the 1st sequel. The Twilight movie merely rather sucks, that's even worse then the books.

Answer 4

I like Twilight, a lot of what said about her is true.

She not the best writer: True

Her character are not fully thought out or grow as characters. True, Bella character did I actually liked in the first two book, the other two she was kinda annoying.



But I still liked the books and movies. Actually the movie pretty funny.



Harry Potter on the other hand is brilliant.



J.K. Rowling really turn the time to make a place where kids can escape and enjoy the world of magic. The best thing J.K Rowling did for this world was make it realistic, of course there magic, what kid doesn't want to like in a world of magic? I know I did. But just look at her characters, see who easy at least one of them could relate to you.



J.K. Rowling did something great she made not only kids, but teens and Adults want to read the same thing. She made parent have something in common not only with there nine year old but with there 16 year old as well. How many authors can say that. J.K. Rowling changed the way people looked at books.

Answer 5

Twilight is best by far. Harry Potter is a good book.. but with Twilight I literally couldnt put the books down. I stayed up until 6:45 in the morning just to finish each one. Once you start you cant stop. 4 books in 3 days? Has to be a good book lol. When i tried to read Harry Potter, I couldnt finsh it. Id get bored and put it down forgetting Id even started..

Answer 6

I love them both! But I may be biased towards HP because reading HP was my reading catalyst! Just like Twilight is now for many new readers, after reading Harry Potter I couldn't get enough!

I do own more HP apparel and accessories, and I've seen the movies more in the theaters than I have Twilight.

I don't think though it has much to do with which one is BETTER really, cuz they're just so different, and both amazing, but like I said before, I'm just partial to Harry Potter!

Go Gryffindor!! :)

Answer 7

Harry Potter. The last few books were boring though. I have never read Twilight.

Answer 8

Here come the thumbs down.... but I like the Twilight series better because honestly I couldn't stay interested in Harry Potter, I couldn't even stay interested in the movies overall Harry Potter is boring. While I was reading the Twilight I didn't want to stop reading and I actually was interested in it. TWILIGHT ROCKS! :)

Answer 9

I like harry potter more



the writing and literature, even if for a childerens book is waayyy better then the literature used in twilight. Rowling did a much better job then Meyer, and she worked much harder for all of her fans too. Stephenie Meyer wrote a cheesy love story. As soon as it was put on screen and a handsome actor was stood in front of it, that was when all the twilight screaming fangirls happened. Could you seriously imagine all those girls screaming for a BOOK? Oh please, they;re screaming for edward, the ficitonary character played by a kind of hot actor!



I can appreiciate both series, but at the end of the day, twilight has a lot of gaping holes in the storyline that are easy to spot. There are not nearly as many with HP, and they are harder to find. JK Rowling explained things more thoroughly to make sure everything could be true, and Stephenie Meyer wrote an unbeliveable (and i mean that literally, its really UNbelievable) and extremly unlikely story about an impossibly perfect romance. Atleast with jk rowling you could sort of believe it, like it could be true. When i was a kid, i would read harry potter and think "Hmm, i wonder if this is true? Maybe when i turn 11 i'll have an owl on my doorstep asking me to join a magical school!" of course when my 11 birthday came and i didn't get that present i wanted, i was less than surprised but still. Harry Potter makes you think, it leaves something to the imagination.

Answer 10

im sorry but ALEX u must be like a freakk.



im surprised how many ppl chose harry potter !



to answer your question definately twilight because it feels like theres someone out there to love u as much as edward loves bella. i guess it gives me hope and makes me stay strong.



oh and if u only read the first book harry potter is better but if u read all of them twilight is better. twilight the movie was probably better than all the harry potter movies put together. it's amazingly hard to make a movie better than harry potter.



i love both:)

but twilight is better:)

Answer 11

I agree with the whole search bar.

NONETHELESS.

Which book has been printed millions of times, hundreds of languages, over and over? Which book still gets talked about by people who haven't read it in 5 years? Twilight is a vortex for lonely teenage girls who need someone to talk to when they're on their period. Harry Potter? EPIC.



Rowling had a cultured life, went to great schools, got a fantastic education, knew the WORLD. Meyer? Lived in Arizona or something her whole life. Not that there's anything really wrong with that, but isn't being cultured and brilliantly educated a plus?

Answer 12

Potter

Answer 13

I've said this before, but it's worth saying again:



Harry Potter should never be brought down that many notches to be compared to Twilight; it just shouldn't happen and violates proper literacy. Harry Potter is complex and steeped with meaning and symbolism; every single word that Rowling wrote had thought behind it; every name given had a purpose. Twilight falls flat.

Meyer didn't have enough power to properly write the series in which she attempted, I feel. Her word choice was poor and she obsessively recycled words so often that it became tiresome; we get it, Meyer, Edward was "God-like" and his skin was "marble". She had nothing else; and considering how many words were jammed into that many hundreds of pages, reading her work became painful.

The plot line crumbles at the slightest prob. Between disco-ball vampires, fake werewolves, and strange mortals, it all began not making sense. There was, in truth, nearly zero plot in the first book; Meyer basically slapped on a conflict at the end because she probably realized that, "oh shoot, a book needs a conflict." The first few hundred pages are of Bella staring awkwardly at Edward.

Tacking on to the plot line problem, Meyer basically went against herself on the last book. She basically had no plot, not even to begin with, but, at the chance of another wad of cash and under the pressure of fans, she slapped together the last book, Breaking Headboards. (I mean...Breaking Dawn.) Throughout the series, she managed to build together solid enough explanations of the fantasy world in which she had created, only for the reader to discover that the entire time, she was messily building a piñata; come the last book, she whacked her creation and the entire ordeal of it exploded. In a more literal sense, she contradicted every single thing in which she told the reader; making it that none of it, when applied the laws in which she herself had created, make any relevant sense by the end.

More importantly was the lack of properly fleshed characters. We all love Harry Potter not only because of the brilliant plot but because of the character in which dance around throughout those many pages; the one thing that I love in books the most -- and the thing that I focus a lot of energy on as an author myself -- is the characters. Characters, when properly designed and puppeted, if you will, become realistic and enjoyable; we can easily identify their 'character'istics and they can easily be portrayed as real people. Rowling was successful at that and created fully developed manikins of sorts, inside which was the complexity and reality that we find within ourselves. Meyer, in comparison, created cardboard cut-outs; there was nothing to her characters. Bella was a needy girlfriend, Edward was too perfect to be real, and Jacob was unbelievable. The problem, though, came in the ending; Meyer became too attached and sought a happy ending for the entire cast of her creations; thus, an undesirable and unrealistic ending in which I am extremely disappointed in.

Not to mention, there weren't very good messages throughout the books. As an example, the second book basically taught girls that men are the center of our world and without them we collapse entirely. This is further mirrored in the kind of girls in which so bury their noses in the creases of these books (maybe Twilight is printed on drug paper) and swoon over cardboard.



Twilight was a good laugh, but Harry Potter will last forever.

Answer 14

Like the girl below says Harry Potter is a way better writer AND its for children I mean come on! Stephanie Meyer repeats a lot of her vocab and she's supposed to be writing to young adults/tweens/teens whatever. 7 Well written books > 4 boring you-know-whats-going-to happen-books

Answer 15

Potter is well written,Twilight is piece of crap Smeyer stole ideas from Anne Rice and L J Smith.Twilight Saga are horribly written books!!

Answer 16

Twilight is huge but it's insignificant compared Harry Potter.

Answer 17

Twilight and Harry Potter are totally different. The HP books are aimed more towards younger kids. There is no romance in the first several books. The books are meant to be read by kids the same age as the characters. The Twilight books, on the other hand, are intended for teenagers - young adults. There is romance, a struggle to make the right decisions, and a less defined right and wrong than in the HP books. They're nothing alike. Personally, I'm a fan of both - and can appreciate the differences in both.

Answer 18

for me, twilight is much better than harry potter.

my sister bought the first book of harry potter (before it was all massive and big) and i was like "hey,can i borrow your book.."

so, i read the first five pages (it was 5:00 pm) ..

i've fallen asleep! (when i woke up, it was already 9:00-9:30 pm)

i didn't continue reading..its so boring.

but when i read the first five pages of twilight i was like "what's going to happen next?!"

it's more entertaining than harry potter.

:)

Answer 19

om.. to make it short:

Harry Potter

to make it long I copied you an great answer (for my part) to the question:

"Harry Potter or Twilight?"



enjoy reading ! ^^

______________________________________...



HARRY POTTER



1. J.K spent more than 15 years on her plot, which turned out to be fantastic. While Stephanie just dreamed about it and started writing, she didn't plan her plot, and mark my words this affected her plot severely.



2. J.K's writing is very captivating, it grips you like a hook and makes you read obsessively. While Stephanie's style of writing though some may find it good, is very weak, she uses the words too often and she writes three chapters each time she wants to describe how good looking Edward is.



3. J.K's series is not only intended for females or a specific age group, as you can see many children, teenagers and adults enjoy it. While Stephanie's saga is basically for young females who didn't read many books to be able to judge with a professional point of view, though I don't call myself a professional, nor am I belittling any reader.



4. J.K's plot is new, it is appealing, no one ever had that idea of a boy who lived due to amazing circumstances. Stephanie's plot isn't new, well I don't call human\vampire affection new, that is used in many books. Since vampires are known to be very seductive and lustful.



5. J.K's characters are very well imagined and described, you can relate to them and find them similar to who you are or people around you. Stephanie's characters well not all of them, but most, are very annoying and rather dimwitted, I wish not to relate to them to tell you the truth.



TWILIGHT



1. It's not well written; Meyer uses the same adjectives over and over (for example, Edward is described as marble, stone, and godlike again and again). The plot is messy. I know it started off as a dream and all, but she should have planned the series out. She claims that as she wrote, her characters told her what to do and told her things she never knew about them, and that's absurd.



2. The characters are bland, flat, one-dementional cardboard cut-outs. Firstly, Bella is a total Mary Sue. She's whiny and made Edward and Jacob her total *****. And soooooooo co-dependent on edward. I happen to find their relationship unbelievable, when did they fall n love ? Edward only likes Bella because she smells good. And Bella only likes Edward beacuse he's because he quote: "like a male model from a magazine" We don't know really anything about them other than their looks. And they only knew each other for TWO weeks before they fell in love, I mean lust.



3. The purple prose is so annoying! "he sparkled like a hundred glistening sparkly diamonds" "His marle stone chisled hard rock body" "his eyes topaz smothered me" Not to mention of eyes and crooked smile every other paragraph. And her grammar is horrible: "My eyes fell on the ringing phone." Well according to Meyer Bella's eyes fell out of their sockets.



4. Plot - There is no logical climax to the story.The whole chase and ballet thing seemed thrown together at the end, as if Meyer had just realized she needed an actual plot.



5. If you make a fantasy world and rules STICK TO THEM!!! Renessme (ew) is not supposed to be alive.





MESSAGES:

TWILIGHT:

1. Fall in love with the first person that you meet

2. All women are damsels in distress

3. A teenage girl should have no dreams except to fall in love, not even going college should matter to her.

4. There is no such thing as friendship when you have the right man. ignore all your simple friends

5. Perfection is bliss, and lust is a must



HARRY POTTER:

1. Love and friendship outlast all things

2. Sometimes one must do what is right instead of doing what is easy

3. Being honerable is not the best title in life

4. Fame isn't everything

5. The world is full of bad people but all of those bad people have a tiny bit of good deep down inside them



P.S JKR's writing is great but not perfect where's SM's writing nothing more than an average fanfiction



P.P.S Harry Potter sold 400 million copies worldwide, wheras Twilight only sold 28 million. You can argue that HP has been around longer but if you take all 400 million and divide them by ten (HP has been around for ten years) that's still 40 million copies each year. So that's answers your question right there. More people prefer HP.





And on one last note I would like to say this:

HARRY POTTER ROCKS

(....\............../....)

.\....\........... /..../

..\....\........../..../

...\..../´¯.|.¯`\./

.../... |....|.... (¯ `\

..|.....|´¯.|´¯.|\....\

..\......` ¯..¯ ´......•

...\_ ............ _.•´

LONG LIVE HP!!



HARRY POTTER will only be gone from this world when none who remain are loyal to it!

______________________________________...

Source(s):

So there are thousend beautifull things you can say abou Harry Potter!

In twilight.. well.. Edward is cute.. and some other things...

Answer 20

Harry Potter, because it's well written with realistic characters and an excellent, original plot.

Answer 21

you kidding me, are you even comparing twilight to harry potter





Harry potter kicks twilights butt

Answer 22

Harry Potter

in twilight, you can skip a few pages and you still know whats going on. In HP, you have to read every single sentance or else you're screwed. it captures your imagination and appeals to more people, young, old, male, female. its got everything: adventure, fantasy, romance, humour...

its a great series

Answer 23

when it comes to books- twilight

when it comes to movies-harry potter ftw

Answer 24

Twilight, because I have always liked vampires more than witches and wizards.



I think Harry Potter is better written though and overall would be considered a better series, but I personally like the story line of Twilight more and that's why I like it better.

Answer 25

Harry Potter -- it is so much richer in language and content!

Answer 26

Okay, well, Twilight is stupid. I really dislike it. I used to be a HUGE fan of it, like major! But now the Twilight fans are all like 'ooooh, Edward is hott!' it makes me sick. And the movie sucked big time.



Harry Potter is also a past obsession of mine, but as a teen I don't have any hard feelings for the books or anything. They're a little below my level, but a few years ago I loved them. It's a great idea, but the writing style is decent but still mediocre. And also there are a LOT of plot holes.



I loveeee Lord of the Rings. It's amazing. It's a completely intriguing and wonderful world... with NO holes at all. Seriously. I have yet to find one mistake in that series. J.R,R. Tolkien is a GENIUS.



I completely agree with Pirate Alien (whatever her name is... sorry haha). Well except that Harry Potter is a work of art, I mean, its good, but there are definitely wayyyy better things out there.

Answer 27

Edit: Awe, someone mentioned me, I feel all squishy inside ^_^. And ok, maybe I did exaggerate a bit on "a magnificent piece of art", but I suppose comparing it to Twilight, it would be considered Art, though I do agree that there are many books and authors that shine over Harry Potter.



The Harry Potter books are a truly magnificent piece of art. It is the ultimate fantasy book that exceeds all expectations.



The characters in Harry Potter are utterly believable. They literally grow with you. They start off as silly kids and grow into young men and woman. Each character has a story, a past, and an ever growing personality. Each one is different and each have their own flaws and weaknesses. They went through everything we have gone through. Besides all of the magic stuff. The first kiss, first date, first dance. Being hooked on a boy/girl, being jealous of a friend. Being stuck between two arguing friends. Going to classes and having to do tests and studies. Everything is relate able.



You have the bully Draco, you have the smartypants Hermione, the goofy Ron. The evil teacher no one can stand, the strict teacher, the favorite. The accident prone, and the just weird friend. The forever talkative. Each one of her characters are real. They are deep, and they grow throughout the years. Each one has their own problems that they must face, and not everything is a cliched happy ending. We face to good times, but we face the hard factual bad times, and that death and despair are real.



For an author to make her characters just so utterly human is amazing.



Then the actual world. This lady literally created a world, and everything she did was backed my actual myths and legends. She created a currency, a school, a world. And in such detail it almost makes you wonder about your own train station, and what might be beyond our own walls. Something that happened in the first book would be connected to something in the fifth. For an author to be writing one book and thinking about a possible connection to one that hasn't even been written, that is talent.



Her style of writing is also superb. It grows throughout the books, as we ourselves grew. She puts in the ultimate amount of imagination without making it seem unreal. Her students are witches and wizards, but they are not super human. They cannot stop death, and they cannot bring the dead back.



It is everything. It has romance, that isnt played out as SOON as the series starts. No, it too grows. To the first crush to the first time you really look at someone and go, wow, I really like this person. It has action, drama, suspense. It makes you want to laugh your head off, cry a thousand tears, and just jump in and participate in classes yourself. It brings out every kind of emotion where as many books only bring out a few.



There has not been one modern book that can top it. Twilight hardly comes anywhere close to the wonders of the Harry Potter books. One person put that it was just about some lame guy with a scar. But isnt Twilight just about a fake vampire and a chick who is obsessed with him? All of those books have the same plot, the same expected theme. Bella gets in danger, Edward saves her.



Twilight is a piece of crap. The characters NEVER change. Bella herself is an annoying blank slate. Think about it. Did she ever -want- to do anything before Edward showed up? She had no dreams, no talents, no hobbies. She didn't care about anything. She was a horrible role model for young girls as well. Not only did she have no life before Edward, he controlled her life after they met. This so called romance between them is highly debatable. Edward dictates what she does, such as going to the prom she did not want to attend, or forcing her to marry him, even though he knew she was uncomfortable with marriage. Yet, she never saw it as destructive behavior. For Gods sake, he even tells Jacob he can sex Bella up whenever he wants, as long as he convinces her to get an abortion. And through the whole time he was gone she was a depressed wraith. She simply could not function without her Prince Charming. Is this what we want young girls to think, that if a guy leaves her she should waste away?



Gee, romantic.



And Meyer put little effort into the background of her books. She did not do any research on vampires at all. Everything Rowling did was based on actual traceable myths and legends. She did her homework.



Not Meyer. How the hell did a vampire sire a child? Sure, Bella is human...but Edward is not! How did he even get it up, and produce sperm to create a kid?? A vampire is..DEAD. They dont do those things! And they sparkle and all have these happy go lucky super powers! Sunshine and daisies.



My favorite little plot hole was pointed out by "Idiot on Yahoo", she noted that Meyer said Carlisle hid in the London sewers during the 1700s, but London didn't even have sewers back then. Nice.



People died in HP. They fought to live, they fought for their cause. They worked for their grades. They earned everything they got, because they were realistic.



Twilight tells you you can have everything, without earning it!



You can be amazingly smart without earning it. Bella never did any type of homework, yet she got good grades. It was just natural. We all know how hard Hermione worked.



But no, everything comes easy to Twilight. Why -work- for anything in that book? We can all sit here and be lazy, fantasize over some random guy and still get good grades!



You can point out a million great things about Harry Potter and only a few mistakes. Where with Twilight you can point out a million flaws and very few good things.

Answer 28

I like the book Twilight. I think that it was a great series and that they were written well.



I have not and will not ever read Harry Potter, I think that Harry Potter is wrong and that it should not be read.

Answer 29

I would say Twilight. The story line is much simpler than Harry Potter is and its so addicting to read while Harry Potter may bore many people

Answer 30

This has been asked a million times it seems...



But, to answer your question, Harry Potter is better, mostly because J.K. Rowling actually has talent.

Answer 31

I like both.

Harry Potter is written extremely well and is very interesting but the plots aren't hard to guess.

Twilight has a very good plot but it hasn't been written that great.

So there the opposite really.

Answer 32

Are you seriously asking this question



Harry Potter, hands down



No one who has read and understood both could disagree with me

Answer 33

Do you realize that when you put this exact question into the search bar, there are 8,227 results?

Answer 34

search bar

Answer 35

Twilight