Question:
Why do some people say JK Rowling isn't a great writer?
me
2009-07-04 14:42:41 UTC
Of course her stories are wonderful, but why do people say that her writing or writing style isn't that great?

I know the way she writes is simple, but why can't it be considered great, just because it doesn't have a lot of big words?
Fifteen answers:
michelle g
2009-07-04 15:57:59 UTC
I enjoy the simplicity of her writing, it makes her books very readable and enjoyable. BUT readability and enjoyment have little to do with greatness.



Literary greatness is achieved by authors who use their writing to comment on the world, society and culture. They provide a microcosm of their era in such a way that readers will be able to see what was happening.



Rowling, for all the enjoyment of her books, has not really used her writing to try and achieve true literary greatness. Oh, she's popular, I'll give you that but if you start to scratch the surface of the stories you'll see just how shallow the stories are. Her stories are pushed by action and not by challenging the readers to consider new ideas. Her stories are simple in vocabulary and grammar but also in theme and structure. And I don't think she ever intended them to be "deep", I think she always intended them to be enjoyed.



To be a great writer takes more than big words or a big fan base.
Moo
2009-07-04 14:56:38 UTC
Some people don't think she is a good writer because they either don't like the fantasy genre; don't like her writing style; don't like the plot or the story in general. A lot of famous authors have both fans and flamers simply because their work is in the media a lot and many people have heard about them or read their books - they're bound to be people who don't like their work. The same thing happened with Twilight, and even the movie High School Musical. Its just people with different tastes, and there's no way of stopping it. Hope I helped.
2009-07-04 14:51:54 UTC
'Cause it isn't. 'Cause she isn't.



Big words don't make the style, mate. People with a very well developed writing style are less than your fingers and toes together. In the whole world.

She isn't great. Mind you she got the hang of writing books and I can't twist my soul and say she sucks. She doesn't. But she isn't anything amazing either.



See, I only recently discovered some good writers with a great style, one of them being Sir Terry Pratchett, though many would disagree.



And I'm damn afraid that most of your bestsellers, including Anne Rice do not have good styles. To be read by masses means you must scoop to an overall level and sacrifice Irony, Sarcasm and side stories. You really should try Pratchett once, you'd see what deep Irony means.



Developing a "great" writing style can't happen when you're writing a book that merely contains any hidden messages, and said likes of irony. You can't twist the twist it's self if you are satisfied with one bend in the curve.



And hollyuk, make sure your wife doesn't see this. We women are very skilled in using tenderizer hammers or other kitchen cutlery.
teamron4ever
2009-07-04 14:50:15 UTC
I personally love J.K. Rowling and the Harry Potter books and I can't really complain about her writing. I think she is a waaaaayyy better writer than some of the other famous authors *cough cough Stephanie Meyer cough cough* no I'm just kidding but I do think J.K. Rowling's writing is more mature and focuses more on not just romance.
yael5012_y
2009-07-04 15:43:11 UTC
It's just a personal opinion. Hadn't you ever read a book that you disliked because of the writing? It happened to me a lot of times. Some people just prefer writing that is more... complex, I guess.
LifeIsAFreeTripRoundTheSun
2009-07-04 16:56:56 UTC
I adore J.K. Rowling, honestly. But I appreciate that her writing is not amazing. She can evoke emotion and she can tell one hell of a story, and there are far, far worse authors who are completely unable to do even those things, but her style is never going to be comparable to that of some of the literary greats.
adribug354
2009-07-04 20:05:00 UTC
I would say that mainly it is because of the genre. Children's fantasy isn't the most well-respected of genres.



Also, her writing/dialogue can be described as simplistic. I happen to disagree, as I'm a huge HP fan myself, but I can see where people might say that.
*Insert something clever here*
2009-07-04 15:20:09 UTC
It's not the simplicity that bothers me. The writing just feeled rushed. Not enough detail, and it's one exciting event after another. It has nothing to do with big words.
Lola
2009-07-04 15:03:10 UTC
i am not fond of JK Rowling. I didnt find her writing very interesting but I guess thats just my taste in genre
Nobody Special
2009-07-04 14:47:10 UTC
People say it because they don't enjoy Harry Potter or the way she's written it. Not everyone is going to agree when it comes to choice in literature, and there's no reason to expect everyone to. There's also no reason to fight over it. If you like Harry Potter, enjoy Harry Potter. If you don't like Harry Potter, let other people continue to enjoy it. And hopefully they'll allow you to enjoy the things you like.
Blue Skies
2009-07-04 14:50:23 UTC
It's not that her writing is simple, that's an admirable quality in writing. Personally I found her writing to be a little convoluted and confusing structurally.
Kimby
2009-07-04 14:54:14 UTC
@ imagine- just because you dont like the subject of her books, doesnt mean she isnt an incredible writer. i means you dont like the subject of her books.
Sidra[Phoenix]
2009-07-04 20:51:04 UTC
Because people have their own opinions.
2009-07-04 14:48:11 UTC
Becuase some people, such as me, dont like wizards and harry potter writing, it just doesn't appeal to us.
2009-07-04 14:50:59 UTC
call me sexist



but i think woman dont make very good authors at all


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...