bunny02
2010-11-07 22:25:10 UTC
After I was annoyed by someone claiming they wrote four novels (none of which are published or close to being published), I looked up various definitions of the word novel. Some of the ones that came up include:
"A fictional prose narrative of considerable length, typically having a plot that is unfolded by the actions, speech, and thoughts of the characters."
"A fictitious prose narrative of considerable length and complexity, portraying characters and usually presenting a sequential organization of action and scenes."
"An invented prose narrative that is usually long and complex and deals especially with human experience through a usually connected sequence of events "
Of course, none of these definitions fit within my own preconceptions of the word. Now, I am still inclined to say that the quality of writing matters and that publication is an important factor. I think that the word novel should be more selective.
What are your thoughts on the matter?
BQ: According to your own definition of the word, have you written a novel?
BQ2: If yes, how many?
As for me, I say that I'm working on a story that I hope to be published as a novel, but I avoid saying that I'm working on a novel. I'm of the opinion that you can only do that when you're already a published author.